Posted by Payne on 11/25
i never realized how cheesy it was to have a level 50 mage bind a mid-rang
person until i had it done to me. i used it against a few people, and
it's really unbalancing in the mid-range area. there should be the
10 level limit placed on bind. i can't really see a downside to it
besides having to work a little harder in pk.
Sunday, November 22, 08:49PM
While on the subject of bind, implementing the 'paralyse'
spell would be nice as well. I know I would find it useful.
Sunday, November 22, 10:39PM
Bind is an aggressive spell, and I can only see it as a bug
if it fails to abide by the 10 lvl restrict.
Monday, November 23, 12:42PM
I agree with Papercut and Payne. No downside to it to restrict it to '
Monday, November 23, 05:33PM
Rufus pointed out on one of the immortal mailing lists that
bind could be used to, say, bind a lower-level healer to keep them
out of a fight, and thus does have some use as a non-aggressive spell.
Tuesday, November 24, 10:49AM
Givin the number of healers that are pkill this spell has a lot more
potential to be an agressive spell for a high level helping out a low
level pkiller I think.
Tuesday, November 24, 10:51AM
so what about those pesky low level wakers =P
Tuesday, November 24, 01:41PM
Thats kinda stupid. If high levels are use'n it to get low levels killed
then it should have a 10 lev restriction. I think that bogus that it doesn't
Tuesday, November 24, 11:31PM
So you can bind a low lvl healer, but then why not allow for walls
to be effective outside the lvl 10 diff as well? I think the lvl restrict
was there so that lowlvlers beyond a certain char was just that, beyond
reach. Unless we want to start divying spells up to agg and simply
potentially agg--fear, blind, bind, weaken, steal, etc etc etc, i say stic
with the restriction we have now and give bind a 10 lvl restrict.
Wednesday, November 25, 10:35AM
BTW, a day after this was posted I tried to bind someone 11 levels under
me and it didn't let me (gave me the 10 level difference reason)
I guess its been fixed?
Thanks for the info =P