Posted by Mac on 04/16
I'm finding that change where you can't follow someone that's invis
a real inconvenience.. Another example where I say 'screw realism!'.
Friday, April 16, 01:55AM
Magic is unreal, but we all accept it as real on here, so that doesn't
matter. But i don't see why one shouldn't be able to follow invis- unless,
ofcourse, you don't have detect invis, in which case i agree :-p.
Friday, April 16, 03:28AM
Nothing inconvenient about it, all you have to do is have the
invisible guy follow you, instead of vice versa. Sides, you
can't even tell when somebody decides to follow you invis, nor
when they look at you anyway. Mmm. should make it that you
can't follow people who are sneaking as well unless you have
high perc or detect hidden :p
Friday, April 16, 04:01AM
Umm, try taking a couple of low levels through rudh, you
can't really let them lead. I'm talking about having your
whole group invis requiring all but one to have detect invis.
It's not an inconvenience, it's a pain in the ass.. So much
so there's hardly reason for invis anymore outside of pk.
Friday, April 16, 04:08AM
mmmm. issue them all specs for the time being :p
maybe there should be a nifty spell that at least lets you
follow invis ppl.
or an item that you can use like a group boat or something.
btw, what happens if the leader has a group boat, goes invis
in the sea..? do the followers just drown?
Friday, April 16, 04:27AM
There is more to following than just sight. You could theoretically be
leading someone by grabbing onto their shirt or having them follow your